The Association of Christian Economists

An Academic Society for Christians in the Economics Profession

  • Home
  • About ACE
    • Donate to ACE
  • 2023 ACE Conference
  • Faith & Economics
    • Aims and Scope
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Archives
  • Podcast
  • Membership
    • My Account
    • Join ACE
  • Log In

Faith & Economics – Fall 2018

FAITH & ECONOMICS

F&E_cover

NUMBER 72
Fall 2018






ARTICLES

Returns to Education in the United States: Differentials among Christian Affiliations by Gender
Sedefka Beck

Abstract: This study examines the returns to education for the three major Christian affiliations in the United States—mainline protestants, conservative protestants, and catholics—using data for non-Hispanic whites from the 2005 Panel Study of Income Dynamics. The returns to education are examined at the mean with ordinary least squares and along the wage rate distribution using quantile regressions. At the mean women generally have higher returns to education than men do. However, along the wage rate distribution, different patterns of the returns to education are observed among religious and gender groups. Mainline protestant women have higher returns to education than their male counterparts at low wages, but similar returns to education at high wages. Conservative protestant women have fairly uniform returns to schooling throughout the wage distribution that are also higher than the returns to schooling for conservative protestant men across the wage distribution. In contrast, the rates of return to schooling for Catholic women and men are generally similar along the wage distribution, except at the highest two deciles where women have higher rates of return to schooling. In addition, older conservative protestant men have lower returns to education than their younger counterparts do.

Rerum Novarum and Economic Thought: Some Comments on Professor Waterman from an Italian Point of View
Giacomo Costa

SYMPOSIUM

Trade with Developing Countries in a Global Value Chain World
Judith M. Dean

Is There a Moral Case for Globalization?
Steven R. Weisman

VIEWPOINT

Against Market Complicity
John P. Tiemstra

Abstract: The doctrine of market complicity holds that entering into a trading relationship causes each party to take on some moral responsibility for the other parties’ actions. For example, consumers who buy goods made in sweatshops are guilty of abusing workers, and employers are guilty if their employees use their health insurance to terminate a pregnancy. I argue that this is not the case. The market nexus does not cause us to take on moral responsibility for decisions we are not empowered to make. Vendors should not discriminate against buyers with different religious or moral views, and employers should not try to constrain their employees’ personal moral choices. Consumer boycotts are unlikely to be effective unless they make political demands.

BOOK REVIEWS

Men Without Work: America’s Invisible Crisis
Nicholas Eberstadt
Reviewed by Lance Wescher

Redeeming Capitalism
Kenneth Barnes
Reviewed by Luke Petach

Pope Francis and the Caring Society
Robert Whaples (editor)
Reviewed by Karla Borja

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Print
February 28, 2019

Post navigation

Fall 2018 Issue of Faith & Economics Now Available → ← Review of: Pope Francies and the Caring Society – Borja

Journal and Website Search

Browse Recent Articles

Review of A Sacred Journey: Faithful Presence in the Secular Academy

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 Review ofA Sacred Journey: Faithful Presence in the Secular AcademyPaul Nicholas Wilson Reviewed by Andrew HansenAnselm House Full Text PDF

More Info

Review of Pricing Lives: Guideposts for a Safer Society

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 Review ofPricing Lives: Guideposts for a Safer Societyby W. Kip Viscusi Reviewed by Matthew P. ForsstromWheaton College Full Text PDF

More Info

Review of Political Economy as Natural Theology: Smith, Malthus, and Their Followers

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 Review ofPolitical Economy as Natural Theology: Smith, Malthus, and Their Followersby Paul Oslington Reviewed by Christina McRorieCreighton University [...]

More Info

Review of Capital and Ideology

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 Review ofCapital and Ideologyby Thomas Piketty Reviewed by Jamin HübnerUniversity of the PeopleLCC International University PDF Full Text

More Info

Review of Causal Inference: The Mixtape

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 Review of Causal Inference: The MixtapeBy Scott Cunningham Reviewed by Sarah HamersmaSyracuse University Full Text PDF

More Info

The Lost Sheep, God’s Body and Housing – Renewing Hearts and Minds into Renewed Communities

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 The Lost Sheep, God’s Body and Housing – Renewing Hearts and Minds into Renewed Communities Virginia BeardHope College Abstract: Home is part of what [...]

More Info

Economic and Environmental Religion: The Work of Robert H. Nelson

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 Economic and Environmental Religion: The Work of Robert H. Nelson Paul OslingtonAlphacrucis College Abstract: This article contextualizes and assesses [...]

More Info

Liberation Theology and Development Economics: Unlikely Allies?

Faith & EconomicsNUMBER 78, Fall 2021 Liberation Theology and Development Economics: Unlikely Allies? Annette Davis and Christina McRorieCreighton University Abstract: This article proposes [...]

More Info

Feedback

Any questions or feedback regarding site content or your membership account can be sent to the ACE webmaster.

Navigation

  • My Account
    • Membership Billing
    • Membership Cancel
    • Membership Checkout
    • Membership Confirmation
    • Membership Invoice
    • Join ACE
  • About ACE
    • Donate to ACE
  • Faith & Economics
    • Aims and Scope
    • Archives
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Membership
  • Home
  • Archives – Old Issues
  • Podcast
  • 2023 ACE Conference

Connect with ACE

Powered by WordPress | theme SG Double